- Tags
-
Refs:
- Mattia Talpo: Kummer-étale additive invariants of log schemes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-CXf24pE9Y
- Links:
Log geometry
# Notes
Reference: Mattia Talpo: Kummer-étale additive invariants of log schemes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-CXf24pE9Y
-
Origins: Fontaine-Illusie-Kato (Deligne, Faltings) in the late 80s, schemes/stacks/derived schemes plus additional derived (“log”) structure.
-
Examples:
- A pair \((X, D)\) of a smooth divisor.
-
Or \(D\) a toroidal embedding, remembers the boundary \(D\)
- toric boundary
- Think about this like "“\(X\) with a marked point on the boundary”
-
How they arise: in characteristic zero, working with a non-compact scheme. Compactify, and use divisor.
-
Every log scheme has a locus where the log structure is trivial, \(\left\{{x\in X{~\mathrel{\Big\vert}~}{\mathcal{O}}_{X, x}^{\times}= M_x}\right\}\), so stalk of a sheaf of \(M\) are units. Think of this like the complement of the boundary.
-
Trivial part of a log scheme pair \((X, D)\) is the complement of the divisor.
- Rank of the free monoid records number of branches passing through singular points:
-
Trivial part of a log scheme pair \((X, D)\) is the complement of the divisor.
-
Logarithmic geometry generalizes toroidal geometry to non-smooth settings.
-
See semistable degeneration