K-Theory


- Tags: - #subjects/homotopy/stable #higher-algebra/K-theory - Refs: - [ ] Inna’s article: https://www.ams.org/journals/notices/201907/rnoti-p1034.pdf - [ ] Some lectures: https://web.ma.utexas.edu/users/dafr/M392C-2015/Notes/lecture3.pdf - [ ] https://faculty.tcu.edu/richardson/Seminars/QuillenKtheory.pdf - [ ] https://www.dpmms.cam.ac.uk/~jes98/K-TheoryWeb.pdf - [ ] Algebraic K Theory for schemes - [ ] Why study K theory - [ ] Adams Atiyah, K Theory and the Hopf Invariant - Links: - THH - transfers, norms, wrong-way maps - equivariant K theory - chromatic - How to construct K theory - The difference between algebraic and topological K theory - The connection between K theory and projective modules - Topological cyclic homology is related and more computable.

K-Theory

Categorical K Theory

Algebraic K Theory

File:Pasted image 20211108230838.png

attachments/Pasted%20image%2020220209192205.png

See Borel regulator, Lichtenbaum-Quillen conjectures, Zeta function

K(Z)

attachments/Pasted%20image%2020220209211517.png

In toplogy

attachments/Pasted%20image%2020220209211421.png

Examples

File:Pasted image 20211105131303.png File:Pasted image 20211105131409.png

Complex K Theory

attachments/Pasted%20image%2020220209184315.png

🗓️ Timeline
  • 2021-06-06

    Roughly twice as hard as computing K-Theory with ku! (Wilson, Adams, Margalis)

    This says either the Hilbert scheme or K-Theory is hard.

  • 2021-05-04

    Allows detecting classes in \(Z^2(X)\) using K-Theory methods.

  • 2021-05-02
    Cool fact: you can show the non-existence of [Hopf invariant one\] elements in dimensions \(1,2,4,8\) using K-Theory.
  • 2021-04-25
    How can we construct this using modern groupoid yoga? Take the category \(\mathsf{G}{\hbox{-}}\mathsf{Mod}\), somehow restrict to just irreducibles. Maybe there’s a better thing to do here though, like “ignoring” reducibles the same way John Carlson “ignored” projectives. But okay, anyway, take that category. Take its nerve and then the geometric realization and then \(\pi_0\) or something? And then take the free \({\mathbb{Z}}{\hbox{-}}\)module. I definitely need to ask some homotopy theorists how this construction goes for usual K-Theory in modern terms. So like… \begin{align*} {\mathbb{Z}}\left[ \pi_0 {\left\lvert { N \mathsf{C} } \right\rvert} \right] .\end{align*} The \(\pi_0\) should be taking isomorphism classes somehow, but maybe this only works for groupoids? But okay, whatever, I just need a functor that takes categories into spaces where two objects end up in the same path component iff they’re isomorphic in \(\mathsf{C}\). So maybe this needs to be something more simplicial set.
  • 2021-04-21
    Link to K-Theory comes from eigenspaces somehow.

    The Relationship Between THH and K-Theory

Links to this page
#subjects/homotopy/stable #higher-algebra/K-theory